Mattawoman Watershed Society, Inc.

Join us to enjoy, protect, and preserve Mattawoman Creek
Home
Comprehensive Plan
Contact Us
Mattawoman falters
A Rare Resource at Risk
Satellite Map
Fact Sheet
Climate Change Article
Sprawl and Climate Change
A Tale of Two Streams
Photos
About Us
Site Map
Donate
Events
Indian Head Science and T
Visit the Creek
Forum Report
Overcup Oak
maps
Links to good websites
What can you do to help?
Fish Eggs Tell a Story
   
 
              Welcome to the Mattawoman Watershed Society!
 

We are a 501(c)3 organization committed to protecting Mattawoman Creek and surrounding watershed. 

MD fisheries biologists call Mattawoman Creek "the most productive tributary of the Chesapeake Bay".

 

The Mattawoman is the Potomac’s most Northern tidal-freshwater tributary to escape the urbanization sprawling from Washington, DC, and it includes extensive and diverse tidal freshwater marshes,

a globally rare habitat.

 

Interested in getting involved? 

Send us your information on the "Contact us" tab to the left. 

More info...email bonniebick@gmail.com or call 301 752 9612

 

***************************************************** 
 
IMPORTANT NEW REPORT!
 
  

 

“The Case for Protection of the Watershed Resources of Mattawoman Creek” by Maryland’s Department of Natural Resources just came out in March, 2012.

 

The report contains a wealth of scientific information about Mattawoman Creek,

and the effects of urbanizing a watershed. 

 

The conclusion of the report is that Charles County’s Comprehensive Plan requires important changes.  

“The future of the Mattawoman Watershed is at a turning point.” And “the current designation of most of the watershed as a Development District virtually assures continuing and dramatic watershed ecosystem deterioration.”

 

The report is available on-line at www.dnr.state.md.us/ccp/coastal_resources.asp

See the In Focus section.

Or download the report directly here.

 

 

 

   Check out the informative and colorful video

of important Charles County watersheds here!

 

GOT PERCH?

Check out a beautiful picture essay in the Washington Post

on spawning yellow perch here.

 

NEWS!

Army Corps of Engineers denies wetland permits for

Cross County Connector!

 

Finds highway “to be contrary to the public interest.”

 

Another nail in the coffin for this sprawl inducing highway!

 

The CCC is the sprawl highway that Mattawoman Watershed Society and many partners have been fighting for years because it would devastate Mattawoman Creek.

 

Now, the Army Corps of Engineers, after lengthy and careful consideration of the highway proposal, has denied “with prejudice” Charles County’s application to destroy acres of wetlands, and pave over floodplains and streams. 

In a letter to the county, the Corps determined “there are other less environmentally damaging alternatives,” and the “proposed project to be contrary to the public interest.”

 

The Corp's February denial is very strong, and follows

the denial from the Maryland Department of Environment last November.

 

The permit denials underscore the wise decision to remove the Cross County Connector from Charles County’s draft Comprehensive Plan called the “merged scenario.”

 

Please stay tuned, because members of the Planning Commission, the body that oversees the revision of the Comprehensive Plan, are agitating for a sprawl inducing transportation “study corridor” that, in the words of one member, would “punch through” to western Charles County, where important cultural and natural assets, including Mattawoman Creek, are at risk from inappropriate development.

 

Read news articles about the Army Corps’ permit denial

here (Bay Journal) and here (Maryland Independent).

   
 

      NEW!  

      Check out this new website to learn more about the scientifically based connection

      between land-use decisions and water quality:

       

      http://dnr.maryland.gov/fisheries/fhep/index.asp

       
       


       

       

      Maryland Department of the Environment denied wetland permit for Cross County Connector

       

      During the first week in November, 2011, the Maryland Department of the Environment denied key wetland permits for Charles County’s Cross County Connector. The permit was denied because the permit application continues to be incomplete after many years, failing to properly account for or address the environmental impacts of the highway.

      This is great news for all who enjoy and care about the Mattawoman, the Potomac River, and the Chesapeake Bay. With Mattawoman now faltering, the highway and its sprawl development would have made recovery of one of the Bay’s best impossible.

      The Mattawoman Watershed Society has been opposing this highway for many years, and is joined by many others in affirming this big positive step towards Smarter Growth in Charles County, including the Smarter Growth Alliance for Charles County, and the national organization American Rivers, who declared Mattawoman the nation’s 4th most endangered River in 2009.

       

      Read the whole denial letter here   MDE Ltr_Cross County Connector.pdf

       

      Read a press release from the Smarter Growth Alliance for Charles County here:Press release 11.04.11 final FOR WEB.pdf

       

      Read an article by the Chesapeake Bay Foundation here:   CBF Bay Daily

       

      Read an article by Washington Post-- Environmentalists celebrate long shot victory at Mattawoman Creek

       

       

      ****************************************

       

      Maryland Department of Planning affirms the CCC

      was contrary to Smart Growth and would have

      harmed faltering Mattawoman Creek!

       

      Read the letter from Rich Hall, head of the

      Maryland Department of Planning to Charles County here:

      Secretary Hall Ltr Nov 3 2011[1].pdf

       

      Charles County Board of Commissioners

      votes not to appeal CCC permit denial!

       

      On November 8, 2011, the Charles County Commissioners voted unanimously not to appeal MDE’s decision to deny critical wetland-destruction permits for the highway. However, a department-wide review of the proposal was ordered to investigate if substantive new information merited a reapplication for wetland-destruction permits.

       

      We hope the county will weigh a key piece new information that surfaced since this sprawl-inducing highway was proposed by previous county administrations. Mattawoman Creek has begun suffering seriously from urbanization of its watershed, according to reports written since 2009 by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources.

       

      To see a summary of the many warnings about Mattawoman’s vulnerability, and the decline in the number of fish species and fish abundance, see the button in the left margin called Mattawoman falters.

       

      Learn more on the need and benefits of Smart Growth in Charles County.
      www.smartgrowthcharlescounty.org

       

      Learn why Smart Growth is good for business in an audio interview from Stuart Schwartz, the region's foremost expert! www.wemakeitnews.com

       

      To see and learn about the scenarios, www.charlescountyplan.org/document-library/meeting-materials

       

      More info...email bonniebick@gmail.com or call 301 752 9612

       


       

      A Photographic Scream Against Suburban Sprawl

      with great photos of the Mattawoman.

      http://cbf.typepad.com/bay_daily/2010/01/my-entry.html

       


       

      U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service urges permit denial

      for proposed Cross County Connector!

       

      On December 23, 2009 the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), Department of Interior, wrote to the Army of Corps of Engineers recommending the denial of a wetland destruction permit for Charles County’s proposed Cross County Connector, saying the county has not adequately addressed how much damage the highway, and new development it would enable, would have on the Chesapeake Bay’s best fish nursery: the Mattawoman Creek and its watershed. The agency said the permit should be denied until a more thorough study of impacts and alternatives to the highway can be conducted. To read a Washington Post article about the letter click here. To read the whole letter, scroll to the bottom of this page.

      The letter vindicates what we, together with the Smarter Growth Alliance for Charles County, a group of twenty organizations led by the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, have been saying for some time. The FWS letter enumerates the high values of Mattawoman’s habitats and living resources. It then emphasizes the vulnerability of these attributes to development (of sort the highway would enable, namely sprawl), stating that the increased impervious cover and forest loss would “have a devastating effect on the water quality and living resources of the Mattawoman Creek..”

      Once you examine alternatives to the highway, it's clear that there are far less damaging approaches that will lead Charles County into a more sustainable future.

       

      You can learn about these alternatives in this excellent report by the Smarter Growth Alliance for Charles County available here: Trouble Ahead—Use Alternate Routes.

       


       

      Charles County’s Water Resources Element (WRE),

      a new component to the Comprehensive Plan.

       

      The WRE is a new state-required component of the county Comprehensive Plan.

      It's supposed to ensure adequate (i) sewage treatment, (ii) drinking water,

      and (iii) waterway health given the county’s growth plans out to 2030.

      Download a pdf presentation on why the WRE is so important here.

      Visit WeMakeItNews.com to watch videos and listen to audio clips of environmental leaders who are gearing up to make the case for Smart Growth -- we need to hear your voice too!

       


       

      Baywide TMDL
       

      A new approach to restoring the Chesapeake Bay is the Bay-wide Total Maximum Daily Load, or TMDL, a “pollution diet” that will enforce limits on the amounts, or “loads,” of nutrient pollution (nitrogen and phosphorus) and sediment washing into the Chesapeake Bay.

      *Mattawoman has had an approved TMDL since 2005, and the TMDL clearly isn’t working with present voluntary policies. Strong enforcement policies are needed.

       

      * Mattawoman Creek mirrors the plight of the Bay and is a case study of why a new approach is needed. Warnings of Mattawoman’s sensitivity to development have been raised by biologists for at least twenty years, but have been ignored. Now, the Maryland Department of Natural Resources reports that the fish populations are showing signs of decline—

      clearly, the old voluntary approach isn’t working.  

       

      The Environmental Protection Agency is soliciting public comments.

      This is an opportunity to shine a spotlight on Mattawoman as a case study showing why a new approach to pollution control is needed.

       

      Please comment!

      http://www.epa.gov/reg3wapd/tmdl/ChesapeakeBay/contactus.html

       

      Read more about the Baywide TMDL here

      http://www.epa.gov/reg3wapd/tmdl/ChesapeakeBay/index.html

       

       


       

       

      Paradise Lost?

      Proposed Road Threatens Mattawoman Creek

       

      Despite claims that damage can be mitigated,

      the waterway is already showing signs of stress

      from encroaching development

       

      By Rona Kobell Chesapeake Bay Journal, June 2010

       

      Physicist Jim Long fell in love with the Mattawoman at first sight.  Who wouldn't? The Southern Maryland creek is like a chameleon. In the shallower parts, it looks like an enchanted forest-with a canopy of river birch and willow oaks. Ferns, flowers and shrubs, like the fragrant pawpaw, sprout from the ground. Where the sun peaks through, the water is clear enough to count the river herring.

       

      The deep, open-water part is even more spectacular, covered in marshes thick with rice and lotus flowers unfurling their glorious blooms. Kayakers glide past in awe; anglers try their luck in the bass-rich waters. In its quiet splendor, the Mattawoman looks like it belongs in the remote areas of Costa Rica or Ecuador.

      Instead, the Mattawoman is only 20 miles from the Washington Beltway, and therein lies its problem. It's in the fastest-growing region of the state. And it winds through some of the last undeveloped stretches of its corner of Charles County.

       

      The Charles County commissioners and other local politicians are pushing to build the Cross-County Connector, a road that would cross Mattawoman Creek and bring development to the Indian Head peninsula. They note that the road has been in the planning stages for nearly 30 years. They have cleared nearly every planning hurdle and are not asking for any state or federal money. Nearly two-thirds of the 16-mile road has already been built-only the contested stretch planned near the Mattawoman remains. Government officials believe they can mitigate the effects of the road and the impervious surface it will bring.

       

      Long and his fellow volunteers at the Mattawoman Watershed Society argue that no mitigation will save the Mattawoman from the devastating consequences of more building. Several environmental groups, including the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, are working with them to stop the road. Also raising concerns about the Cross-County Connector are the Maryland Department of Natural Resources and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

      Charles County commissioners contend that the road will not cause major impacts. But scientists and activists say development has already hardened 10 percent of the creek's watershed, and it can't take much more before the creek is seriously degraded. Already, the stream's populations of river herring and white perch are showing declines. According to estimates from the Department of Natural Resources, if the road is built, the Mattawoman will eventually reach 22 percent impervious surface. If that happens, and the creek follows the pattern seen in other waterways with developed watersheds, one of the Western Shore's most valued creeks will cease to be productive. Plants and fish will die.

       

      "The creek is telling us just what the scientists have been telling us to look for," Long said as he stood knee-deep in the creek, counting fish eggs. "The Mattawoman is a poster child for the issue of land use impacts to the Chesapeake Bay."

      The road's last hurdle is obtaining two permits, one from the Maryland Department of the Environment and the other from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Those agencies would need to grant the county permits to disturb wetlands and specially protected waterways. Old Woman's Run, a Mattawoman stream, was designated as a Tier II waterway-a designation for a water body of excellent environmental quality. A decision from the two agencies is not expected until the end of the year, after Maryland's gubernatorial election.

      Long has been counting eggs each spring for about 10 years. Not long ago, he would see hundreds of tiny orbs floating in his glass jar. This year, he saw about two each time he sampled.

       

      Jeff Horan, DNR's director of watershed services, said the Mattawoman remains as close to ideal conditions for a stream as exists in Maryland-except for the fish. Counts are down for most species. It could be because of an excess of road salt used to treat winter's extreme snowfall. But it also is likely from the development that has already come.

      State Sen. Thomas "Mac" Middleton, who served on the county commission from 1984 to 1994, said the county took a lot of care in developing a growth plan and in detailing a road that would mitigate negative impacts.

       

      "We changed the course of the road. It's not like we have said we don't care. I do care, but I'm a realist. We're a beautiful county, we're 25 miles south of D.C., and people are going to continue to move there," he said. "I think it probably will have an impact on the Mattawoman, but if there are impacts, how do you mitigate it?"

       

      It is hard to show the downsides of a road that doesn't yet exist. But DNR fisheries ecologist Jim Uphoff put out a report called "A Tale of two Creeks," which compares Mattawoman to Piscataway Creek in Prince George's County.

       

      "In Piscataway, which has undergone the development that the Mattawoman is slated to have, the anhadromous fish spawning has, in fact, ceased," Uphoff said.

      Also of concern are rare and endangered species in the Mattawoman watershed. The Maryland Department of the Environment is looking into the possibility that Krigia dandelion, a small, yellow flower, and Melica mutica, a two-flower watergrass, would be threatened by the construction.

       

      The fight to stop the road is almost as old as the plans to build it. In the 1980s, when Charles County designated its growth area-which is larger than the entire District of Columbia-the area included the Mattawoman. The commissioners built a large sewage treatment plant in the watershed to handle the growth. Then they approved Chapman's Landing, a 4,600-home development on 2,100 acres in Chapman's Forest near the Mattawoman's headwaters. The project was zoned and had the necessary wetland permits.

       

      But to then-governor and Smart Growth champion Parris N. Glendening, the project was little more than sprawl. After months of negotiations, Glendening had the state buy the land for $28 million. The commissioners and some of the governor's own advisers criticized the purchase, in large part because the development had already mitigated for environmental impacts and because the price was so high. But environmentalists cheered the decision.

       

      Especially grateful was Bonnie Bick, a longtime Mattawoman activist. She believed the battle had been won, and the road would disappear shortly after the Chapman's project did. But it didn't. And developers began proposing even more development in the area.

       

      Since 2005, Mattawoman has had a total maximum daily load, which is supposed to limit the pollution that can flow into the creek. So far, only a few rivers in the watershed have TMDLS, but the EPA is requiring them for all tributaries. Last fall, EPA officials began a series of hearings to explain the new requirements, and Bick made sure she and her fellow advocates argued their case to protect the Mattawoman at hearings in Baltimore and Annapolis, and at a Clean Water Conference in Washington where several congressmen and environmental officials, including Administrator Lisa Jackson, spoke.

       

      "The Mattawoman could be a big win for the Chesapeake, at a time when all eyes are on the Bay," Bick said. "You have to wonder, what is the hope for the rest of the bay if the TMDL doesn't work here?"

       

      Bick is indefatigable when it comes to advocating for the creek and for land preservation. She walks with a cane, the result of a broken pelvis and other injuries she suffered in a car accident in St. Mary's County in 2004. The crash occurred on her way back from a protest against then-Gov. Robert V. Ehrlich Jr.'s plan, later scrapped, to sell several hundred acres of a protected state forest to Baltimore developer Willard Hackerman. But her injuries don't appear to slow her down as she crisscrosses the state on behalf of her beloved creek.

       

      Her efforts are gaining traction. She has met with J. Charles Fox, Jackson's point-man for Chesapeake Bay. Last year, American Rivers, a national nonprofit, put the Mattawoman on its list of the nation's most endangered waterways. The creek has been featured on draft maps of the Treasured Landscapes initiative, which is trying to protect large-scale landscapes in the Bay watershed.

       

      The strength of her citizens' group spurred the Chesapeake Bay Foundation to get involved, which it rarely does in local land disputes. The last time the foundation officially entered one of these fights was in 2006, when farmers and environmentalists in Dorchester County opposed a project to bring several thousand homes and a hotel and conference center to a rural area near the Blackwater National Wildlife refuge. That fight ended with then-Gov. Ehrlich agreeing to buy the property just a few days before Election Day.

       

      Later this year, Ehrlich will challenge Gov. Martin O'Malley, who beat him last time around, for the state's top job. Reminiscent of the 2006 election-year efforts, CBF and the Mattawoman Watershed Society are urging constituents to contact O'Malley in hopes of defeating the project.

       

      "We know what we need to do to clean up the Mattawoman," said CBF advocacy manager Terry Cummings, "and yet, we are doing the opposite."

       

      Environmentalists would rather focus the county's growth in Waldorf and keep it out of Mattawoman. They are pushing a rail line from Waldorf to the Branch Avenue Metro Station in Prince George's County. The county and the state have already endorsed the plan. But Middleton and others have been working on that since 1988, and the rail line doesn't seem imminent as funding is tight.

      Opponents know it is hard-almost impossible-to kill a road project. Montgomery County activists fought the Inter-County Connector for nearly three decades. The first part of that road is slated to open later this year. More often, agencies get together to mitigate the impacts of the project.

      But DNR's Horan is not confident that can be done in the case of the Cross-County Connector. "You cross a threshold, and really, limiting impacts may not be enough," he said. "I haven't given up on the Mattawoman yet. But, if the 22 percent (impervious surface) comes to pass, then we will have lost it."

       

      Rona Kobell is a former writer for the Baltimore Sun.

      You can read, see pictures and make comments on this article at:

      http://www.bayjournal.com/article.cfm?article=3868

       

       

      Mattawoman is featured in a map of Chesapeake Bay Treasured Landscapes!

       

      Recently, the Friends of the John Smith Chesapeake Trail, the Environmental Law Institute, and the National Geographic Society issued a map of Treasured Landscapes in support of a special report that outlines a strategy for better conservation of areas important to the Bay. Mattawoman is featured prominently as a component of the Potomac River system that retains remarkable historical and natural assets in need of preservation.

       

      You can learn more at the Friends of John Smith Trial site. http://www.friendsofthejohnsmithtrail.org/files/OLD JST SITE/files/treasuredlandscapes/ELI Report Final.pdf

       

      Map of the Treasured Landscapes http://www.friendsofthejohnsmithtrail.org/files/OLD JST SITE/files/treasured_landscapes/NGS Treasured Landscapes map screened.pdf

       

       

      EXTRA! EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT!

       

      August 20, 2010 Mattawoman forests dedicated as an Important Bird Area by the Audubon Society at the Mattawoman Lotus Blossom Festival Click here: Maryland Independent

       

      Jan. 13, 2010: A Photographic Scream Against Suburban Sprawl with great photos of the Mattawoman. http://cbf.typepad.com/bay_daily/2010/01/my-entry.html

       

      Jan. 1, 2010: Mattawoman’s importance as a Bay issue highlighted by well-known author Tom Horton, voice of the Chesapeake Bay. Click here: Bay Journal

      Dec. 31, 2009: U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service recommends denial of wetland permit for proposed CCC-ex. Click here: Washington Post

       

      Dec. 23, 2009: Maryland postpones permit decision on destructive Cross County Connector. Click here: Maryland Independent.

       

      Dec 2009 Mattawoman Matters by Jim Long The Sierra Club, MD Chapter

      http://maryland.sierraclub.org/newsletter/archives/2009/12/a_009.asp

       

      Dec. 9, 2009: “Health of Mattawoman is key to Bay cleanup strategy.” Click here: Maryland Independent 

       

      For more information, contact Bonnie Bick bonniebick@gmail.com

       

      Thank you for visiting our site. Together we can make

      Charles and PG counties a healthier place to live and play.

       

      If you would like a bumper sticker,

      please send us your contact information on "contact us" at the top left of the page.